The fresh new Bombay Large Court’s opinion regarding Smt Kanchan v
- The details and you will items with the situation showed that this new spouse didn't come with separate income and this this new respondent-wife were able to allow the husband support lower than Areas 31 and you can 31 of one's 1955 Act. This new Court is convinced that the petitioner is actually permitted maintenance pendente lite, expenses of your own process, and you will long lasting alimony and fix, according to research by the respondent's individual income and you may income off their properties, the new petitioner's earning function, and also the parties' carry out. Because of the affairs and you may things of your own circumstances, it actually was bought your respondent-partner must pay Rs. 500/- given that courtroom expenditures and Rs. 100/- per month while the restoration pendente lite and you may permanent alimony on the petitioner, partner, regarding the big date out-of app up until his demise or remarriage, whichever comes earliest.
Smt Kanchan v. Kamalendra (1992)
Kamalendra (1992) are a noteworthy that regarding restoration of your spouse given that Hon'ble Legal had noticed that spouse couldn't rely exclusively with the money away from their partner and you can giving fix in order to a skilled individual commonly provide idleness if the partner can be work and you can secure.